Improving access to justice has been an ongoing process, and on-demand justice should be a natural part of our increasingly on-demand society.

Despite enormous investments of time and money, are we making a dent on the social and environmental challenges of our time? What if we could exponentially increase our impact?

HiiL partnered with The Centre for Law and Democracy (CEDEM) to explored the legal challenges that mSMEs face and tried to understand how mSMEs access justice.

In an Internet society we will neither need nor want doctors, teachers, accountants, architects, the clergy, consultants, lawyers, and many others, to work as they did in the 20th century.

This profound report outlines a radical new way of thinking about how to fund justice.

We can make the world of legal services & legal practice better through design.

This LegalTech Buyer's Guide provides in-depth analysis of leading players across 12 categories of legal technology

Developing new ways to bring fairness to people

The legal industry has long been risk averse, but when it comes to adapting to the experience-driven world created by companies like Netflix, Uber, and Airbnb, adherence to the old status quo could be the death knell for today's law firms.

The Working Group was asked to review the evidence of unmet justice needs, explore the potential for innovation, explore the investment possibilities, provide parameters for enhancing innovation for SDG16.3

A book describes the most known and proved methodology for startup companies.

Justice needs in everyday life were severely affected by the conflict that started in 2014. In 2016, when the conflict intensity was decreasing, we interviewed more than 6500 residents.